Safe Third Party Agreement Canada

Ottawa is appealing a court ruling that overturned a major refugee deal between Canada and the United States, Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said Friday. But the increase in refugee applications came at a time when the third-country security agreement was in force. Since the agreement allows the government to deport asylum seekers who attempt to enter official ports of entry, future refugees who do not meet specific exceptions under the agreement, such as. B a family member living in Canada, must find other ways to cross the border if they wish to apply for refugees in Canada. At the recent hearing before Stratas J., counsel for this group argued that the government`s assertion that there would be an “increase” in new asylum seekers at the border if the agreement was struck down was “speculative” and “hypothetical”. In order to put an end to this “forum shopping” under the STCA and its Canadian legislation that is able to make it possible, asylum seekers generally must apply for asylum in the first “safe” country in which they enter. Under Section 159.3 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, the United States is considered a “safe” country under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). [5] Conservative immigration critic Peter Kent said on Friday that his party had called on the government to “fill long-standing gaps” in the Safe Third Country Agreement. Julie Taub, an immigration and refugee lawyer, says the Canada Border Services Agency has lost capacity since the agreement was put in place in late 2004 and would be “overwhelmed” if the agreement was repealed.

[23] The government stated that the abolition of the agreement would result in an “inflow” of asylum seekers at the border, making it more difficult for different levels of government to maintain the existing refugee system, including the provision of housing and other social services. The agreement, which allows any country to deport asylum seekers trying to apply for refugees at official border crossings, was declared unconstitutional by the Federal Court of Justice in July. Canada “continues to actively engage” with Washington in the refugee pact and ensures that the agreement reflects Canada`s commitment to its international obligations “while continuing to work on how we manage our shared border,” he added.

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /homepages/25/d474474472/htdocs/clickandbuilds/WordPress/RHD/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 405